Points by season
Career NHL points, ending with the 84-game projection (violet).
Pool value
Projected full-season fantasy worth.
why 31?
Each row is one fantasy category turned into points over a full 84-game season. Add the rows up and that is his total fantasy worth.
- proj goals13 × 3+39
- proj assists18 × 1+18
- PP points0 × 0.5+0
- game-winning goals0 × 0.5+0
- OT goals0 × 0.25+0
- shots84 × 0.1+8.4
- PIM0 × 0.05+0
- ice time (min)917 × 0.01+9.2
- total75 pool points · an elite forward season scores 24275 = 31/100
Weights follow what the average fantasy league actually counts: goals at 3× assists (the universal core), power-play points and game-winners at half weight (common extra categories), OT goals, shots and PIM small (many leagues skip them), and ice time as a quiet availability bonus. The scale: add up a whole season of those categories and compare against the best forwards in the NHL — an elite season scores about 242 points, and that is what 100 means. So 75 points is 31 out of a perfect fantasy season at his position. Defensemen and forwards are graded on separate scales because the D slot can only be filled by a defenseman. Goals and assists come from the backtested season model; the rest ride your own season-to-date pace over 84 games (1 games so far — small sample, secondary lines will move as roles settle). Hits/blocks are excluded: the free NHL feeds don't publish full-season totals, and we don't invent them.
Season stats
NHL regular-season totals, season by season. The 84-G proj line extends the current season with our public model — methodology in the caption below the table.
| Season | Team | GP | G | A | P | +/- | PIM | PPG | PPP | SHG | TOI/GP | GWG | OTG | S | S% | FOW% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Jets | 29 | 2 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10:37 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 6.9% | 0.0% |
| 2020-21 | Jets | 26 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8:24 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 6.3% | 61.1% |
| 2021-22 | Jets | 77 | 7 | 6 | 13 | -8 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9:29 | 0 | 0 | 67 | 10.4% | 63.6% |
| 2022-23 | Jets | 22 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10:49 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 16.7% | 22.2% |
| 2023-24 | Penguins | 45 | 0 | 4 | 4 | -4 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8:12 | 0 | 0 | 37 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 2024-25 | Ducks | 62 | 2 | 4 | 6 | -13 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10:56 | 1 | 0 | 49 | 4.1% | 53.4% |
| 2025-26 | Ducks | 44 | 3 | 5 | 8 | -6 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9:35 | 0 | 0 | 37 | 8.1% | 51.4% |
| 2026-27 | Lightning | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10:55 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 84-G proj | Lightning | 84 | 13 | 18 | 32 | — | 31 | — | 0 | — | 10:55 | — | — | 101 | — | — |
84-G proj — current pace blended with the player's own history (recent seasons weighted heaviest), mixed with a similarity projection from historical players with comparable profiles, then adjusted for the aging curve (league-average peak at 27; decline after) — at age 29 that is -1%. Dashes mark stats the model doesn't project.
Data via the public NHL API · 2026 Pro Hockey Stats